SDL Trados Studio PlugIn - QA Checker Regular Expressions Collect
SDL_Trados_Studio_PlugIn__QA_Checker_Regular_Expressions_Collect
It is version 2017 only
Do not use with version 2019
First of all, You have to make a temp folder and copy into all the files you needed.
It harvests only RegExpQA settings from
Template files (.sdltpl)
Project files (.sdlproj)
QA Checker Profiles exported settings (.sdlqasetting)
RegExp exported items (.sdlqasetting).
All of them will be included under the current project's settings.
Never worry about overwritting of all the other settings.
Duplicated RegExQAs will be deleted ("Description" order).
Current project file are saved as BAK.
Enjoy !!
Do not expect too much from SDL
SDL just do what they want to do
(Un)Fortunately, that is quite different from what you wanted
Link
https://deeptranslation.blogspot.com/2019/01/sdl-trados-studio-plugin-qa-checker_25.html
You can guess what is going on there by this clue.
SDL_Trados_Studio_PlugIn__QA_Checker_Regular_Expressions_Collect
It is version 2017 only
Do not use with version 2019
First of all, You have to make a temp folder and copy into all the files you needed.
It harvests only RegExpQA settings from
Template files (.sdltpl)
Project files (.sdlproj)
QA Checker Profiles exported settings (.sdlqasetting)
RegExp exported items (.sdlqasetting).
All of them will be included under the current project's settings.
Never worry about overwritting of all the other settings.
Duplicated RegExQAs will be deleted ("Description" order).
Current project file are saved as BAK.
Enjoy !!
Do not expect too much from SDL
SDL just do what they want to do
(Un)Fortunately, that is quite different from what you wanted
Link
https://deeptranslation.blogspot.com/2019/01/sdl-trados-studio-plugin-qa-checker_25.html
...
..
.
[Note]
This program is Free of charge and has no hidden string absolutely.
Except, it does not have SDL signature.
I have tried to get SDL's sign but, SDL denied to sign my plugins.
SDL signs plugins exclusively to post their own place ONLY.
As you can see, this place is not the SDL's narrow homeground.
And, SDL says, You (not me) have to pay money to get SDL's signature for this one.
That's nonsense and bullshit. That signature is useless and needless.
The developer has final responsiblity for it, not the SDL.
Let's say you wanted to update or upgrade or nice idea for that.
What the heck SDL can do for you ? N.o.t.h.i.n.g.
- I saw it clearly, when SDL changed their stuff to 2019 version.
- They could do nothing. SDL just waited and saw its developers.
If you want warning_less version of it.
Tell me, I'll do it for you with the same cost.
Additionally, I suspect SDL could make a Backdoor when they check myPlugIns.
Just like Apple/MS/Intel/HuaWei.Though I do not have any kind of hard evidences.
This program is Free of charge and has no hidden string absolutely.
Except, it does not have SDL signature.
I have tried to get SDL's sign but, SDL denied to sign my plugins.
SDL signs plugins exclusively to post their own place ONLY.
As you can see, this place is not the SDL's narrow homeground.
And, SDL says, You (not me) have to pay money to get SDL's signature for this one.
That's nonsense and bullshit. That signature is useless and needless.
The developer has final responsiblity for it, not the SDL.
Let's say you wanted to update or upgrade or nice idea for that.
What the heck SDL can do for you ? N.o.t.h.i.n.g.
- I saw it clearly, when SDL changed their stuff to 2019 version.
- They could do nothing. SDL just waited and saw its developers.
If you want warning_less version of it.
Tell me, I'll do it for you with the same cost.
Additionally, I suspect SDL could make a Backdoor when they check myPlugIns.
Just like Apple/MS/Intel/HuaWei.
I have found a hard evidence;
https://deeptranslation.blogspot.com/2019/01/sdls-backdoor.htmlYou can guess what is going on there by this clue.