SDL Trados Studio PlugIn - advanced TermBase viewer (5) PickList Formatting
SDL_Trados_Studio_PlugIn_advanced_TermBase_viewer_PickList_Formatting
It is version 2017 only
Do not use with version 2019
I'm trying to display some Color/Formatting of Fields(specifically, PickList).
Color, Strikeout and Bold should be good enough
-You can define formatting for all and every PickLists
-SDL's default uses only one formatting for all Fields, that is really lovely..
* This is testing stage, though works well. If you see any bug(s) tell me please *
Regards
Link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cEFI1RBt7hAfDnJUAlpay6ntCA3BVDeT/view?usp=sharing
You can guess what is going on there by this clue.
SDL_Trados_Studio_PlugIn_advanced_TermBase_viewer_PickList_Formatting
It is version 2017 only
Do not use with version 2019
I'm trying to display some Color/Formatting of Fields(specifically, PickList).
Color, Strikeout and Bold should be good enough
-You can define formatting for all and every PickLists
-SDL's default uses only one formatting for all Fields, that is really lovely..
* This is testing stage, though works well. If you see any bug(s) tell me please *
Regards
Link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cEFI1RBt7hAfDnJUAlpay6ntCA3BVDeT/view?usp=sharing
...
..
.
[Note]
This program is Free of charge and has no hidden string absolutely.
Except, it does not have SDL signature.
I have tried to get SDL's sign but, SDL denied to sign my plugins.
SDL signs plugins exclusively to post their own place ONLY.
As you can see, this place is not the SDL's narrow homeground.
And, SDL says, You (not me) have to pay money to get SDL's signature for this one.
That's nonsense and bullshit. That signature is useless and needless.
The developer has final responsiblity for it, not the SDL.
Let's say you wanted to update or upgrade or nice idea for that.
What the heck SDL can do for you ? N.o.t.h.i.n.g.
- I saw it clearly, when SDL changed their stuff to 2019 version.
- They could do nothing. SDL just waited and saw its developers.
If you want warning_less version of it.
Tell me, I'll do it for you with the same cost.
Additionally, I suspect SDL could make a Backdoor when they check myPlugIns.
Just like Apple/MS/Intel/HuaWei.Though I do not have any kind of hard evidences.
This program is Free of charge and has no hidden string absolutely.
Except, it does not have SDL signature.
I have tried to get SDL's sign but, SDL denied to sign my plugins.
SDL signs plugins exclusively to post their own place ONLY.
As you can see, this place is not the SDL's narrow homeground.
And, SDL says, You (not me) have to pay money to get SDL's signature for this one.
That's nonsense and bullshit. That signature is useless and needless.
The developer has final responsiblity for it, not the SDL.
Let's say you wanted to update or upgrade or nice idea for that.
What the heck SDL can do for you ? N.o.t.h.i.n.g.
- I saw it clearly, when SDL changed their stuff to 2019 version.
- They could do nothing. SDL just waited and saw its developers.
If you want warning_less version of it.
Tell me, I'll do it for you with the same cost.
Additionally, I suspect SDL could make a Backdoor when they check myPlugIns.
Just like Apple/MS/Intel/HuaWei.
I have found a hard evidence;
https://deeptranslation.blogspot.com/2019/01/sdls-backdoor.htmlYou can guess what is going on there by this clue.