Trados Studio PlugIn - comment View ActiveSegment [Updated]
Trados_Studio_PlugIn_comment_View_active_segment
It is version 2017 only
the most part is identical with the following OLD one;
SDL Trados Studio PlugIn - comment View 1 [OLD]
https://deeptranslation.blogspot.com/2018/07/sdl-trados-studio-plugin-comment-view.html
but, Now,
you can get Current Source Comment with one Click (icon)
the comment is copied into current Target segment's first place
Or
Click any part of Viewpart(display area - not icon)
then
you can get Current Source Comment too
the comment is copied into current Target segment's first place
Enjoy
[YouTube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDLA8woeF2tl_Nc-Xvq2mYA/videos]
Link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fQA_m0_Y3btF623C23Wj2kgstJiHdCl3/view?usp=sharing
You can guess what is going on there by this clue.
Trados_Studio_PlugIn_comment_View_active_segment
It is version 2017 only
the most part is identical with the following OLD one;
SDL Trados Studio PlugIn - comment View 1 [OLD]
https://deeptranslation.blogspot.com/2018/07/sdl-trados-studio-plugin-comment-view.html
but, Now,
you can get Current Source Comment with one Click (icon)
the comment is copied into current Target segment's first place
Or
Click any part of Viewpart(display area - not icon)
then
you can get Current Source Comment too
the comment is copied into current Target segment's first place
Enjoy
[YouTube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDLA8woeF2tl_Nc-Xvq2mYA/videos]
Link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fQA_m0_Y3btF623C23Wj2kgstJiHdCl3/view?usp=sharing
...
..
.
[Note]
This program is Free of charge and has no hidden string absolutely.
Except, it does not have SDL signature.
I have tried to get SDL's sign but, SDL denied to sign my plugins.
SDL signs plugins exclusively to post their own place ONLY.
As you can see, this place is not the SDL's narrow homeground.
And, SDL says, You (not me) have to pay money to get SDL's signature for this one.
That's nonsense and bullshit. That signature is useless and needless.
The developer has final responsiblity for it, not the SDL.
Let's say you wanted to update or upgrade or nice idea for that.
What the heck SDL can do for you ? N.o.t.h.i.n.g.
- I saw it clearly, when SDL changed their stuff to 2019 version.
- They could do nothing. SDL just waited and saw its developers.
If you want warning_less version of it.
Tell me, I'll do it for you with the same cost.
Additionally, I suspect SDL could make a Backdoor when they check myPlugIns.
Just like Apple/MS/Intel/HuaWei.Though I do not have any kind of hard evidences.
This program is Free of charge and has no hidden string absolutely.
Except, it does not have SDL signature.
I have tried to get SDL's sign but, SDL denied to sign my plugins.
SDL signs plugins exclusively to post their own place ONLY.
As you can see, this place is not the SDL's narrow homeground.
And, SDL says, You (not me) have to pay money to get SDL's signature for this one.
That's nonsense and bullshit. That signature is useless and needless.
The developer has final responsiblity for it, not the SDL.
Let's say you wanted to update or upgrade or nice idea for that.
What the heck SDL can do for you ? N.o.t.h.i.n.g.
- I saw it clearly, when SDL changed their stuff to 2019 version.
- They could do nothing. SDL just waited and saw its developers.
If you want warning_less version of it.
Tell me, I'll do it for you with the same cost.
Additionally, I suspect SDL could make a Backdoor when they check myPlugIns.
Just like Apple/MS/Intel/HuaWei.
I have found a hard evidence;
https://deeptranslation.blogspot.com/2019/01/sdls-backdoor.htmlYou can guess what is going on there by this clue.